How do we define effective teaching? What is quality instruction? What is the impact on student learning? What impact does technology have on teaching and learning? Can resources improve teaching and learning? How do we approach the scholarship of teaching and learning?
Monday, April 14, 2008
Effective Teaching and Quality Instruction Matrix
Selected Readings on Effective Teaching and Quality Instruction
- American Association for Higher Education, American College Personnel Association, & National Association of Student Personnel Administrators. (1998). Powerful partnerships: A shared responsibility for learning: A joint report. Retrieved February 1, 2005 from http://www.aahe.org/teaching/tsk_frce.htm.
- Angelo, T. (1993). "A teacher's dozen: Fourteen general, research-based principles for improving higher learning in our classrooms." American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 45(8), 3-7, 13.
- Barron, A. (1998). "Designing web-based training." British Journal of Educational Technology 29(4), 355-370.
- Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate: A special report. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
- Caverly, D., & MacDonald, L. (2002, Spring). "Online learning communities." Journal of Developmental Education 25(3), 36-37. Retrieved February 24, 2004 from ProQuest database. (Accession No.: 115177189).
- Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. (1987). "Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education." American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 39(7), p. 3-7.
- Dwyer, F. (1999, December). "Distance education: An evolving instructional technology application." Educational Media International 36(4), 248-257.
- Education Commission of the States. (1995). Making quality count in undergraduate education: A report for the ECS chairman's 'quality counts' agenda in higher education. Denver, CO: ECS Distribution Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED388208).
- Gillespie, F. (Winter 1998). “Instructional design for the new technologies”. In R. Menges & M. Svinicki (Series Eds.), K. Gillespie (Vol. Ed.), The Impact of Technology on Faculty Development, Life, and Work (pp. 39-52). New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Number 76, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Glassick, C., Huber, M., & Maeroff, G. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate: A special report. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Publishers.
- Grasha, A., & Yangarber–Hicks, N. (2000, Winter). “Integrating teaching styles and learning styles with instructional technology”. College Teaching, 48(1), 2–10. Retrieved September 15, 2004 from ProQuest Education Journals database. (Document ID: 50577656).
- Grunert, J. (1997). The course syllabus: A learning–centered approach. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing, Company, Incorporated.
- Howell, D. (2001, Summer). “Elements of effective e–learning: Three design methods to minimize side effects of online courses”. College Teaching, 49(3), 87–90. Retrieved July 12, 2004, from Wilson Education Abstracts database. (Document ID: 82834518).
- MacDonald, L., & Caverly, D. (2001, Fall). "Engendering online discussion." Journal of Developmental Education 25(1), 38-39. Retrieved February 24, 2004 from ProQuest database (Accession No.: 85406679).
- McClenney, K. (2004). "Redefining quality in community colleges." Change, 36(6), 16-21. Retrieved October 6, 2006 from ProQuest database (Accession No.: 756263741).
- McKeachie, W. (1994). “Peer learning, collaborative learning, cooperative learning”. In W. McKeachie (Ed.), Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. (9th Ed.), (pp. 143-151). Lexington, MA: DC Heath and Company.
- Moore. M. (1989). "Editorial: Three types of interaction." The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
- Newlin, M. H., & Wang, A. Y. (November 2, 2002). “Integrating technology and pedagogy: web instruction and seven principles of undergraduate education”. Teaching of Psychology, 29(4), 325–330. Retrieved June 4, 2003 from EBSCO Journals, http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=A5D31JHHHJQH9Y7K2U9B.
- Oakes, J. (1989). "What educational indicators? The case for assessing the school context". Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 181-199.
- Parkes, J., & Harris, M. (2002). “The purposes of a syllabus”. College Teaching, 50(2), 55. Retrieved December 2, 2004, from Wilson Education Abstracts database. (Document ID: 134519661).
- Porter, A. (1989). "External standards and good teaching: The pros and cons of telling teachers what to do". Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(4), 343-356.
- Porter, A. (1991). "Creating a system of school process indicators." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(1), 13-29.
- Twigg, C. (2003). "Improving quality and reducing cost: Designs for effective learning." Change, 35(4), pp. 23-29.
- Yoon, S. (Winter 2003). “In search of meaningful online learning experiences”. In S. Imel & J. Ross-Gordon (Series Eds.), S. Aragon (Vol. Ed.), Facilitating Learning in Online Environments (pp. 19–30). New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, Number 100, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Labels:
professional development,
quality,
readings
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
